Thoughts on Bitcoin economics:
- Bitcoin as a battery: Makes energy portable, storable and transferable by turning it into a currency that can be used to pay for energy later.
- Bitcoin v/s other internet-based platforms like Twitter and Netflix: They also draw on the power-grid offering a different form of usability/ offering. That being said, Bitcoin’s market cap has been more than that of Netflix and Twitter – combined.
- The original whitepaper compares bitcoin with gold: Gold miners employ (human) resources to add gold to circulation. In bitcoin’s case, the resources include CPU time and electricity.
- Fundamental of Bitcoin, acc. the original Whitepaper by Satoshi Nakamoto: Once a CPU finishes its work (of solving artificially created mathematical puzzles – Hash) and furnishes a proof-of-work, a new transaction block is added to the ledger (chain) and the CPD is rewarded with a coin.
- The stated proof-of-work may have no real meaning or benefit – questioning the sustainability of bitcoin.
Environmental impacts:
- Bitcoin usage produce enough CO2 emissions to push warming above 2°C within less than 3 decades [Source: Nature]
- Bitcoin network wastes 110 TWh annually (≈ 1.6 × energy yield of the Tsar Bomba nuclear device ≈ more than the energy used by Ireland or Denmark) [Source: CBECI]
Recent Posts
The cryptocurrency market is swamped with coins and tokens vying for your attention to invest… Read More
It might make sense just to get some Bitcoin in case it catches on. If… Read More
A decentralised autonomous organisation (DAO) operates without the need for hierarchical management and can serve… Read More